NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- Before MDI Construction sends me off to Indianapolis for Sunday's crucial AFC South game, we need to sort through the mail.
You should also know about the sale going on here that runs through Cyber Monday. Even Delanie Walker, who you will find at the end of this, says you should check it out.
Sale! Black Friday through Cyber Monday. Check it out. pic.twitter.com/aezsM3d5hM
— Paul Kuharsky (@PaulKuharskyNFL) November 24, 2017
Now on to your questions. Thanks for giving me plenty to choose from, I've tried to hit on a good variety.
If Mularkey were forced to make changes to his staff would he be so loyal to them and refuse despite the consequences? #pkmail
— The General (@mac9nj) November 24, 2017
PK: This is a more complicated question than you might think.
For starters, Mike Mularkey only has one year on his contract after this one, and presumably, the majority of his staff is in line with that. (Outside of Dick LeBeau, who I believe is year-to-year.) The prevalent thinking of many fans is, get a new assistant and things change dramatically. Mularkey has control of his staff, not Jon Robinson. And Mularkey's assistants are doing what he asks them to do or what he signs off on them doing.
Having Amy Adams Strunk or Robinson issue a directive for a change on the staff is not the same -- or as important, frankly -- as issuing a directive about a change in approach.
